Today: January 20, 2018

To Contribute →

Login Register

 America’s Afghanistan adventure is a disaster

October 17, 2015 at 10:37 pm | News Desk

1024px-Afghan_Army_neutralizes_IED

371232-atul-singh-author-ed

 

 

By Atul Singh

In 52 BC, Vercingetorix threw down his arms at the feet of Julius Caesar. This marked the Roman victory over Gaul. Caesar went on to write Commentarii de Bello Gallico, while Vercingetorix was paraded as a prisoner in Rome and then strangled to death.

Caesar claimed he had to invade Gaul to protect Rome. In reality, he was deep in debt. His overriding motive was to pay back his debt by conquering and plundering Gaul. Yet over time, Romans built roads and aqueducts in Gaul and other conquered lands. The civil law systems used by much of the world have their roots in Roman law. This article itself is written in the Roman alphabet.

The United States is the Rome of our times. It fashioned the existing global order at the end of World War II. The United Nations, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank are all located in Uncle Sam’s backyard, making it easier to impose its will in international institutions. Hollywood and Harvard dominate the imagination of even its most ferocious rivals. The dollar is the world’s reserve currency, which means the US can get debt for free. The US is also a safe haven where insecure wealthy elites park their money. Russia and China might rattle their sabers from time to time, but their citizens are buying American property from New York to California.

The US does not just dominate economically and culturally. It is also the most formidable military power the world has ever seen. As the Peter G. Peterson Foundation points out, the US spent $610 billion on defence in 2014. This is 20% of federal spending and more than the combined defence expenditure of the seven other biggest military powers. The US can strike a target anywhere around the globe, blow up the world many times with its nuclear weapons and even exert power in space. Many world-changing technologies have emerged from US military research, including the Internet.

Yet for all its might, the US has come up short in Afghanistan. This week, President Barack Obama apologised because US airstrikes targeted a Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) hospital in Kunduz, killing 12 staff members and wounding 37 others. The United Nations has called the attack “tragic, inexcusable and possibly even criminal.” MSF has long operated in dangerous areas and its people have been killed before. In fact, it left Afghanistan in 2004 for five years after five of its members were brutally murdered. This time, the US has killed more MSF people than the Taliban. It brings into stark focus the failure of Uncle Sam in its Afghanistan adventure, which this author predicted in 2010.

The airstrikes occurred because the Taliban had taken over Kunduz. This town borders Tajikistan and is the gateway to Afghanistan’s northern provinces. It is connected by road to Mazar-e-Sharif, which lies west and to Kabul, which lies south. It commands one of the most important drug smuggling routes in the region. Opium and heroin make their way from Afghanistan to Europe through Central Asia. The Taliban already controls much of the nearby rural areas and it was only a matter of time before it attacked Kunduz.1024px-Afghan_Army_neutralizes_IED

The ease with which Kunduz fell demonstrates how utterly out of its depth the US finds itself in places like Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria. Not too long ago, the US failed spectacularly in Vietnam despite throwing the kitchen sink at that tiny country, including using Agent Orange. Why does Uncle Sam come up short time and again in its overseas military adventures despite pouring much blood and treasure into them?

The answer to this question is neither simple nor straightforward. Yet a key factor that contributes to US failure is this country’s ignorance of the Old World. The US is a land of immigrants who embrace the overriding myth that they are an “exceptional nation” that can extend the frontier and function without any constraints. This enables Americans to create new technologies and world beating companies. Silicon Valley, home to Apple, Google and Facebook, personifies this American radicalism. The rest of the world is not the US and certainly not Silicon Valley. Resources are limited. Rivalries run deep. The past is ever present. Constraints are real.

In Afghanistan, this ignorance of the Old World has led to disastrous consequences. Most Americans have no clue that many luminaries of the Taliban were beneficiaries of American largesse when they were fighting the Soviets as mujahedeen. Once the Soviets left, the US forgot old friends like Ahmed Shah Massoud, a Tajik who was the best of the anti-Soviet rebels and nicknamed the Lion of Panjshir. He was hated by the largely Pashtun Taliban and killed two days before the suicide attacks on American soil.

The US invasion of Afghanistan succeeded spectacularly because far too many people in Afghanistan were chafing against the Taliban. However, the US was clueless as to what to do next. George W. Bush invaded Iraq and American focus shifted, leading to catastrophic consequences. The half-hearted process of state formation with foreign diplomats, administrators, soldiers and contractors was conceptually flawed and implemented horrendously.1024px-ASLAV_in_Afghanistan_during_early_2011

Afghanistan is a wild barren land where disparate tribes live in accordance with traditional norms. It is not a European nation state with a Weberian bureaucracy, old legal systems and a coherent national identity. Identities crisscross borders. Pashtuns in Afghanistan have more kinship with fellow Pashtuns in Pakistan than with Tajik or Uzbek Afghans. Sir Mortimer Durand once drew up the border of Afghanistan with utter disregard for the natives and with the sole aim of furthering British imperial power. The border and the Afghan national construct simply do not work.

Pakistan provides a toxic mix into an already combustible cocktail. The “land of the pure” has feared implosion right from its outset because Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan, the leading Pashtun leader in British India, was an associate of Mahatma Gandhi. Khan opposed the creation of Pakistan and Pashtuns voted against the Muslim League, the party of Pakistan’s founder, for decades. Unsurprisingly, Khan ended up spending more time in Pakistani jails than in British ones and died under house arrest in 1988.Afghan_village_patrol

Despite the quick US victory, the Taliban was bound to bounce back. The so-called Afghan national government is not national and certainly not a government. It is a bunch of feuding warlords fighting for scraps of patronage doled out by the US. People, particularly in rural areas, choose the Taliban over foreign troops who do not speak their language and disappear after brief tours of duty to the other side of the world. Furthermore, elements in Pakistan’s powerful military still back the Taliban. It is their way of keeping Pashtuns distracted and cultivating a natural ally that will back them against India.

Unlike Caesar in Gaul, Obama is trying to retreat, not conquer—to spend less instead of earn more. He uses drone strikes and airstrikes to fight the Taliban because he wants to save American blood and treasure. These strikes have long killed innocents, but they are now in focus because they hit a legendary humanitarian European organization.

Unlike Russia, the US prides itself for having a clear moral compass. That compass is increasingly erratic and will become more so until Americans become less ignorant of the Old World.

 The author is the Founder, CEO & Editor-in-Chief of Fair Observer. This article was first published in fairobserver.com.

News Desk

Economic Affairs Editor

Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!